Journal/01
Career
Building a career
with a global perspective
12 Mar 20247 min read

For a long time, I thought building a career meant moving forward in a relatively predictable direction: study, specialise, gain experience, take on more responsibility, and gradually become better at what you do.
My own path initially looked quite close to that model.
I studied business and finance, worked in France and the United States, then moved to Luxembourg, where my career developed across audit, banking, funds and financial crime compliance.
On paper, these experiences form a professional trajectory.
But over time, I realised that the most important part of that trajectory was not simply the succession of roles. It was the fact that every new environment forced me to reconsider something I thought I already understood.
And that has changed the way I think about a career.
A career is more than a sequence of job titles
Job titles are useful. They tell people roughly where we have been and what we know how to do.
But they capture surprisingly little of what an experience actually teaches us.
Working in audit taught me to examine information critically and understand how organisations operate beneath the surface. Moving into AML/KYC and compliance brought another perspective: how institutions assess risk, make decisions and translate increasingly complex requirements into operational processes.
Working across different organisations also showed me that the same problem can be approached very differently depending on the culture, structure and people around it.
Those lessons matter to me more than simply accumulating titles.
Because experience is not only about becoming more specialised. It is also about developing better judgement.
Changing environments changes the way you think
This became even clearer outside the conventional professional environment.
Living and working internationally repeatedly put me in situations where my usual reference points were no longer sufficient.
More recently, spending time in different African countries through volunteering, community initiatives and travel pushed that much further.
The environments could hardly be more different from Luxembourg finance. And that is precisely why they matter.
When you move between a financial institution, a school, a healthcare setting, a conservation project or a community initiative, you begin to notice which skills remain useful even when the context changes completely.
Listening. Understanding before acting. Adapting quickly. Communicating with people whose assumptions may be very different from your own. Recognising when the way you normally solve a problem simply does not fit the situation in front of you.
None of those abilities belongs to one profession. They belong to the person you are becoming.
Growth is not always vertical
One of the ideas I have gradually questioned is that progress must always look like a ladder.
A higher title. A larger salary. More responsibility. The next logical position.
Those things can absolutely represent progress. But they are not its only form.
Sometimes growth is vertical. Sometimes it is lateral. And sometimes the most useful thing you can do is deliberately step outside the trajectory you already know.
Learning something unrelated to your profession, travelling, volunteering, building a project, entering an unfamiliar environment or simply allowing yourself to become a beginner again can initially look disconnected from a career.
I increasingly see the opposite.
These experiences expand the range of situations you can understand and the number of perspectives from which you can approach a problem.
They create connections that would not exist if every decision were optimised solely for the next line on a CV.
The value of crossing worlds
This is probably what “a global perspective” means to me today.
It is not about collecting countries. And it is not about presenting an international life as inherently more interesting than another one.
It is about crossing worlds often enough to realise that your own way of seeing things is only one possible way.
Finance taught me structure, analysis and rigour. International experiences have challenged assumptions and strengthened adaptability. Community experiences have brought me closer to realities that are easy to abstract from a distance. Creative and digital projects have given me space to build rather than only analyse.
And personal challenges have repeatedly reminded me that confidence often develops after deciding to do something, not before.
These parts of my life may appear unrelated on a conventional CV. I no longer think they are.
Together, they influence how I work, how I make decisions, what I notice and what I want to build next.
A career does not have to be linear to be coherent
For a long time, I thought professional credibility came from following a clear progression: choose a field, become increasingly specialised, and make sure every next step could be easily explained by the previous one.
Experience has taught me something more nuanced.
Specialisation matters. It builds depth, judgement and technical credibility. But depth is not the only form of professional value. Moving between audit, banking, compliance, international environments and projects outside traditional finance has shown me that some of the most useful skills are cumulative rather than role-specific: learning how to analyse unfamiliar situations, ask better questions, communicate with very different people, recognise patterns and adapt without losing rigour.
The important distinction, I have realised, is between a career that is scattered and a career that is multidimensional. The difference is not whether every experience belongs to the same industry. It is whether you understand what each experience has taught you and how those lessons connect.
That has changed the way I think about my own career. I am less interested in building a résumé in which every line looks predictable from the one before it. I am more interested in building a body of experience in which each chapter adds a capability, a perspective or a question that I could not have acquired in exactly the same way elsewhere.
Perhaps career coherence is not something we find by looking backwards for a perfectly straight line. It is something we create by understanding what we have learned, what we can now do differently, and what we choose to carry into the next chapter.